Redevelopment: what to do
After our requests the Authority to carry out as soon as the ranking personnel capable of crossing between Areas I and II ^ ^ (from 'ex Area A-, the former economic position B1)-n Administrative Officer - Technical Officer
ensure equal opportunities
and end the slide in rankings for the steps in Area
The National Coordination urged the Central Government to take urgent action to ensure equal opportunities and to complete the slide in the rankings of staff for the steps in all areas, a day after he had also asked to define the transition between the I and II ^ ^ Area, thus allowing the possibility to make assumptions from the outside, since the available places are made - in fact - with the definition of the concluding Passes Area.
Our request was also strengthened by the reported notices attached to the ministerial circular No 143, June 20, 2007 (including administrative agreements / Trade Unions.'s June 7, 2007) where he is also emphasized that "pending the issuance of the authorization request to extend until 1401 the total seats for ' access to the economic position B1 the Administration may proceed in the operating role .
For ensure equal opportunities and stop the slide in the rankings for all steps of Area ,
the National Coordination TODAY has also put in default the Administration to devise strictly the conclusion of the steps that remain outstanding ,
considered that in case there are still more than 10 million of € !
It shows the summary of communications sent to the General Staff to the arch. Antonia Pasqua Recchia, and the Secretary General arch. Roberto Cecchi, as well as having also informed the Director of OIV, Dr. Anna Maria Buzzi, namely the Department authority to re-evaluate the productivity and efficiency in the Ns. Ministry (cd : Performance).
"We would like to detect, even for a timely discussion and conclusion to the bargaining table , announced that the last meeting last October 4, showed - once again - the inequality of treatment between the steps in all areas and revealed no evidence of clarity and transparency regarding the latest frameworks following:
- the difference in the scrolling lists in II and III ^ ^ Area;
- of change in the appointment on appeal (administrative, court, ex art. 700 cc);
- ; further appeals for review of clerical error;
- pronunciation Authority administrative, judicial or extrajudicial.
There has been, and still we are witnessing, in cases (phenomena) of employees who had signed the Agreement in different regions were then sent (invited) immediately to serve in places of origin without any reasons of administrative transparency and exercised due notice to trade unions signatories to the redevelopment.
Specifically, the disparity in treatment between steps II and III ^ ^ Area has terminated their service on the , and is stunning when it is expected that "only terminated their service will determine the next available organ, which will allow other frameworks, financial resources permitting " . This disparity needs to be clarified as soon as possible and can not be applied only where some workers are more richly framed in economic position.
therefore should not be overlooked, as envisaged by the National Collective Labour and the unions signed agreements, the possibility of completing the transition of all workers between the I and II ^ ^ Area, was unfortunately totally rejected.
Rather, we would not want this way of proceeding in the administration, is a precautionary action according to a staff movements
from other ministries that anything having to do with the completion of the upgrading processes in place within the Administration of Cultural Heritage. Finally, we would not like us - once again - to a constitution of an impediment for the conclusion of all the processes of regeneration.
As shown is advancing the legitimate protests of the affected workers who gathered at the meeting and requested to proclaim a state of agitation by mandating the union to set in motion initiatives and legal union that is complied with rule Job retraining and in the subsequent bargaining agreements entered into.
Therefore, on the basis of the foregoing, we ask:
1) The publication following the " new status "
· of slipping in the ranking as a result of termination of service to all areas;
· of change in the appointment on appeal (administrative, court, art. 700 cc);
· ; further appeals for review of clerical error;
· of administrative rulings of the Authority, judicial or extrajudicial.
2) The motivations that have informed the Administration to work on:
- cases (phenomena) of employees who had signed the contract in different regions were then sent (invited) immediately serve in places of origin without any reasons of administrative transparency exercised.
3) The immediate adoption of measures in the framework higher pay bands for all employees resulting still in place useful in its rankings (I, II and III Area) through the slides and the changes occurred, using their deaths as indeed provide the current labor agreements signed, considered that in case there are still over 10 million € .
As always, the National Coordination Committee on this issue will continue to push ahead with strength and decision claims already in place in defense of the staff represented.
Sincerely
(Dr. Joseph Urbino)
0 comments:
Post a Comment